Iowa Ag Lawyer|Golf is not agro tourism No Kidding??

Today, the California bankruptcy court issued a ruling confirming what a real Iowa ag lawyer should already know, that golf is not "agro tourism."  A debtor in bankruptcy was attempting to avoid some zoning issues by asserting that the 18 hole golf course was an agricultural use and therefore doesn't have to follow zoning regulations.

I am glad to see that not even the wildly liberal and expansive thinking judicial system of the west coast bought that argument. If they had, it would be what is referred to as " a slippery slope".  Bird watching would be next, followed by hiking and photography. Every case serves as a jumping off point for new applications of the law.

Closer to home, Floyd County Iowa is implementing zoning Ordinances  for agriculture areas to require farmers to get a permit to build a building. This is a great example of government creep, first is a simple permit, then its building code, then its good bye  to the very flexible nature of farm life that draws the hardy spirit to the country side.

I understand about 20 farmers showed up and contested the matter, with the aid of the regional Farm Bureau. I wonder how many of those farmers paid attention to the county supervisor's race that put those rule makers in power. I wonder how many small town lawyers are paying attention.




Iowa Farm Lawyer|Why you shouldn’t dance in the farmland ball

      

Grain and livestock prices have gone up and down in the last quarter decade. Farmland values have gone up every year for during that same time period with interest rates doing exactly the opposite. Bankruptcies in farm operations are rarer than an original prom dress.  Some of those years have been slight bumps, but most have been giant leaps, with Kansas City Federal land bank indicating Nebraska land values jumped 40% last year. That type of steady action is the type of dance partner everybody looks for.

Average farmland values in Iowa has moved from upper $2,000s per acre in 2005 to an easily over $7000 per acre in 2011, which choice parcels selling over $12,000-$16,500. Right now 50% of farm ground is rented and the majority of Iowa farm ground is held by those over 65 years old.

Where those purchasers of farm ground buy their pencils is apparently a secret, because the pencils most folks use determine that those prices are solid business acquisitions do not come up with a buy recommendation.
Who is buying the ground? Investor’s see a safe bet instead of the wild party girl of the stock market and farmers are dancing with the partner they know, soil.
What is going to stop the music and send the dance partners home? Corn prices losing ½ of the value back to the $4.00 range (which five years ago sounded great), along with the input industries (seed, crop protection, fertilizer and chemical) continuing to  rocket upward costs to capture the high prices of the product produced can quickly change the tune. Companies have invested heavily in GMO products and are now moving to crop protection products outside the seed to keep increasing profits and yield. They will not lower prices when commodity prices fall.

Interest rates also play a key. Some predict 6-7% interest in the post 2012 Election years, other predict 4%, however most agree that low interest rates that we see regularly now are going to be a thing of the past. This cuts into operating cash for the over extended farm operator and makes farm land look way less tantalizing to outside investors. Moving interest from the near nil level of today to 4% can cut deep into the per acre return that has to pay the inputs, the rent, the machinery and the light bill.
Most look at a capital return on investment to determine the value of farm ground. They take the interest rate available and compare it to what the return per acre is available via production or rental. The problem with that model is to sustain the per acre analysis with a change in interest rates, requires an increase in the rent obtained, which is unlikely when prices fall and inputs remain high. A farm lawyer should suggest a pure profit per acre approach, with assumptions built in for rising costs and declining return, reflect the true value in the future of the land. Maybe some of those dancers should stay home and wash their hair instead.
  




Iowa Ag Lawyer|Congress may be messing with your estate plan



 

 

The Congress of the 2000s just can't let the practice of estate law and planning untouched. The congress has modified estate tax law more times in the last ten years than in any other time period and the changes are often times swift and dramatic. Even when they don't intend to, Congress has a way of fouling up everybody's plans. Putting it writing helps, but keeping your eye on Congress is required.

The drama budget of this late summer created a new law. This law raised the debt limit  and created a congressional panel referred to as the  “Super Committee".   They are required to come up with deficit reduction legislation to be this year.   Its recommendations to Congress go public on November 23 with a vote up or down by December  23.   Failure to agree triggers some automatic spending cuts. Congress can act awful fast when it wants to and it perceives votes and seats are on the line.

The plan may include an attack on $5,000,000 exemption to gift and estate tax.  Talks and whispers suggest that the committee will change the   exclusion amount from $5 million to $1 million on New Years Day or sooner. That is less than two months away. Quite frankly, it would be low hanging fruit to adjust this amount in the eyes of the representatives who have up to 50% of their voting base not paying any tax at all.

Couple this change with the high level of land prices, commodity prices and equipment values and many farmers who just updated estate plans or those who don’t pay attention at all may be caught unaware.  Having an Iowa Farm law attorney may be a wise investment to understand the true  value of your assets. 

Land prices are up 30 percent in some areas, demand for equipment remains strong and some hint at inflation. These factors can all lead to  drifting into tax brackets that you never dreamed you would be involved in.

Bottom line is that if your estate plan include agricultural ground  and any sort of gifting plans, you need to contact an Iowa Agricultural law attorney and found out how an Iowa Ag Law lawyer can help you maximize the current exemptions under the law.






Iowa Ag Lawyer|Do you have that in writing

 

NE Iowa Farmer OCt 2011 
Do you have that in Writing
            In each of these cases reviewed below, having it in writing was central to the case. Sometimes a writing is good enough and some times it isn’t worth the paper it is printed on. Stopping to think about whether or not a “handshake” will hold up in a dispute is worth the time and effort it takes.
 

Collect the data or don’t collect the reward

 
            Using grid soil sampling and yield monitoring is the industry standard for modern farming. Consider all the ways you can establish your yield. Monitors, weigh wagons, grain warehouse receipts, scale tickets. A farmer filed suit against a Cooperative for impaired crop due to lack of proper spraying. The farmer had no yield records to support his claim. This farmer apparently had no records to support his yield claim and yet demanded compensation. It is a true stretch in those cases to get anywhere. The farmer learned that the hard way. The lesson is to invest in your operation and ensure you have accurate data, especially if you think you are going to have a loss based on some one else’s misconduct.
Sometimes, a handshake agreement just leads to being slapped. An older farmer agreed to help a young farmer with access to land and equipment. The older farmer allowed the young farmer to trade the older equipment off on newer equipment. Nothing was documented or written down. The relationship went south and the young farmer left with all of the shiny new equipment. The older farmer sued for theft of the equipment. The court found that ownership wasn’t clearly proven and the young farmer retained ownership of the equipment.  
           

Parental Releases

In a recent case, parents signed a field trip release, holding the school harmless for negligence. During the trip, a child was hit by a car and the parents filed suit. The supreme court indicated that the pre injury release for was void and allowed the suit to proceed. For those farm operations that have orchard tours, corn mazes, and like, it would appear that requesting parents to sign releases for their children is not going to be adequate protection. This is because the courts are adopting the concept that parent’s cannot waive their children’s claims, the children would have do to that. But since children are insane, they would need to have a guardian appointed to them to help them make the decision on whether to waive or not. Guardian ad litems are appointed by the court. Insurance policies drafted against the risk seem to be a much better option.
             

Bad Drafting Bad Result

An estate plan called for the farm property to be left to an LLC and then the LLC had instructions to pass out membership interests to various heirs. The LLC had to pay inheritance tax on the transfer. If the will had left the property to the children directly or left membership interests of the LLC to the children, no tax would have been due. This failure to consider all angles is why using off the self products like do it your self wills or legal zoom can lead to unplanned for disaster. And when the disaster hits, suing the box the software came in or the website your received “legal help at your direction” is not likely to fix the problem.
 
 
In these cases, the outcome could have been avoiding by proper documentation. Investing in a consult with a Iowa ag lawyer when the farmer suspected crop loss would have helped him gather the right data. When the two farmers formed a plan to transition from the elder farmer to the next, investing in a written plan would have been far cheaper than the legal fees that resulted. The parental release ruling would be hard to anticipate without talking to a Iowa lawyer who is following those types of cases, as the outcome goes against what our “common sense” says the result would be. In the estate case, it is apparent that lack of investing in a Iowa agricultural attorney   who understands the area of the law you are working with can have terrible outcomes.
 
FENCE LAW  
 
The law in Iowa is that a farmer has the responsibility to fence in livestock, but if an animal escapes because of poor fencing by the neighbors, the neighbors can’t recover. If the animal’s owner has the poor fence, he is the responsible party. Taking time to inspect your fence (and note it in a journal) is a good plan for livestock owners.
 
A land owner, even one that doesn’t own livestock, can be compelled to erect fence upon written request of an adjacent owner. Also, a land owner can be made to build or maintain a fence on ground where fencing agreement is in place. A written fencing agreement is the best and where that doesn’t work, the owner can request an order from township trustees. The township trustees will order the fence equally regardless of who benefits most from the fence’s installation.
 
A legal fence is
3 rails (10 feet apart for posts);
3 boards (six inches wide and 3/4in thick posts no more than 8 feet apart) ;
high tensile wire (4 parallel, coated, steel, smooth ASTM wire not more than 2 rods apart and at least 40 inches high)  
three barbed wires (36 iron barbs of two points each or 26 barbs of 4 points, no more than 2 rods apart, 2 stays between posts or 1 rod apart without stays top wire between 48-54 inches);
four wires 2 smooth and two of 25 barbs, 4 points each, 2 rods apart, 2 stays between posts or 1 rod apart without stays )
with all having not more than 20 inches or less than 16 inches from the lowest run to the ground and top run   between 48-54 inches)
A tight fence requires the addition of woven wire to restrain sheep and swine with posts not more than 20 feet apart.
 
If livestock escape 3 times in a 12 month period and trespass on the same landowner, the land owner can make a request to compel that animal owner to make a fence. If the complaining land owner is a neighboring landowner, the complaint may result in the complaining landowner having to put up fence as well.
 
Ag law is a complicated issue and has many facets.  



Iowa Ag Lawyer|Drifting Along

 

NE   Iowa Farmer Sep 2011

Drifting along

 
Pesticide overspray drift   may now qualify as a trespass in Minnesota. . The ruling allows neighbors to file trespass claims against spray applicators for any damages the neighbor believes a spray product caused.

Organic farmers, the Johnsons, sued Paynesville Farmers Union Cooperative Oil Company (PFUC) claiming that PFUC’s spray pesticide and herbicide applications drifted onto the Johnsons’   cropped fields and caused damage on occurred on multiple occasions and caused   crops to lose their organic certification. That would be a big hit as organic products receive a premium price and generally have lower yields. 

While the Johnson’s lost at the trial level on appeal, the court allowed them to proceed, even though the amount of drift may have been smaller than the tolerance level allowed under organic farming guidelines. Additionally, the court made the distinction between smell particles (which don’t qualify in Minnesota as trespassers) and chemical particles (which now do).

This case reflects the trend of allowing claims against spray applicators for damages resulting from pesticide/herbicide drift, whether under trespass, nuisance, or negligence theories. An Iowa ag lawyer is critical to understanding and defending or bringing  these type of cases.

 
 

Flying the Friendly Skies… IRS Style

An corporation took a Section 179 deduction for Cessna's $135,000 purchase price. The business owner started taking flying lessons but didn’t hire a pilot. The claim was that the business needed rapid response and delivery services. Section 179 allows taxpayers to deduct in one year a limited some assets that would otherwise have to be capitalized and depreciated. One catch: an asset has to be "placed in service" by year-end to qualify for the deduction. Apparently learning to fly isn’t enough. As the tax court said
“An aircraft cannot be considered ready and available for business use without a suitable pilot to fly it.” No employees or officers held a pilot's license that would have enabled them to use the aircraft. There was no evidence that there were any "stand-by" pilots for the aircraft.   .
No pilot, no deduction. Easy enough to apply to your area of business. Change airplane to sprayer and you could have the same result. Of course, having a private pesticide applicator’s license is way cooler than having a pilot’s license. Lawyers with ag  background or who are from a farm should be able to steer their clients clear of this type of turbulence.

Details Details Details.

 While you may not be able to “beat city hall” , the IRS, with a spreadsheet and a tax payer with ADD like fixation on expenses, can be beat, even if you don’t exactly follow the IRS’s rules.
An employee worked at an auto service franchises with multiple locations. Her job   responsibilities: she did whatever the operations manager required. She drove from one of the shops to another in order to attend managers' meetings, check inventory, check paperwork, enroll employees in the company's health insurance plan, and research customer complaints. She used her own automobile to drive between the shops. She wasn't reimbursed by her employer, so she claimed her auto mileage as an unreimbursed employee business expense on Schedule A. She used a computer spreadsheet program to maintain her mileage records. She maintained a mileage log showing the use of her automobile for business purposes. The log shows the beginning and ending location of each trip, the date of the trip, andthe mileage for each trip. She had a deduction of over $6,000 in expenses. It did not show the total mileage  or the business purpose of the use of the automobile, which the tax code requires.  It would appear that in this case, something is better than nothing. The battles with the IRS never really stop.



Iowa Ag Lawyer|Better Behave

 NE Iowa Farmer Aug 2011

Better behave, IRS is watching Gifts, Santa Claus!
Many people are taking advantage of the change to a $5 million life time per person gift tax credit and despite the carry over basis, assets are being transferred to the next generation before congress changes its mind about the credit. However, any time a gift to one person exceeds $13,000 a year, the giver is supposed to let the federal tax agency know by filing a gift tax return, even if no tax is due. That part seems to be escaping the attention of gift givers and until recently, the IRS.
The IRS has an effort under way to find out about these transactions. According to an agency estimate, between 60% and 90% of transactions that appear to be gifts of property to family members weren’t reported to the IRS,
It’s using land-transfer records from at least 15 states for evidence of omissions and is seeking the records of more states, including the high-priced property states like California.
States that have released information on gift-like transactions to the IRS include Connecticut, Florida, Hawaii, Nebraska, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, Washington and Wisconsin. Iowa ag attorneys have been watching the steady climb of land prices, it is no suprise the IRS is as well.
 
With   national magazines like Newsweek and the Wall Street Journal  talking about the high price of Iowa farm ground, I wouldn’t be surprised if Iowa is also being targeted. No report on if Santa Claus’s nice list has been subpoenaed yet.
Taxpayers need to be aware that no special exceptions to the rules exist when making a transfer to a family member. If the property is valued at more than $13,000, a gift-tax return must be filed. Even if the transfer falls within a lifetime exemption a reporting requirement still exists. The gift tax return is generally due 15 April of the year following the gift.
For anyone who has already made a gift but has not filed a federal gift-tax return, it is better to file late than not at all. Voluntary disclosure typically works out better than having the gap discovered in an IRS audit. Also, even if the person who gave the property has died, the IRS  can collect tax from his or her estate, the person who recieved the gift, and in some cases, the executor.  An Iowa ag lawyer deals with estates and land values and is in a position to help you determine if you or your parents have run afoul of this rule.



Iowa Ag Lawyer|As if we dont’ have enough to do

 

Published in the NE Iowa Farmer July 2011
As if we don’t have enough to do
 
The Federal Government wants input on its latest great ideas. The first is a new interpretation of federal trucking regulations, which would require any one hauling grain that, “is ultimately used in interstate commerce,” to be subject to federal regulation. The US Supreme Court long ago decided Interstate Commerce includes farmers growing wheat on his own farm, grinding, and using it on his own farm. The rationale is that since he grinds his own, some other farmer did not get a chance to sell it to him. That is a wide net to cast.
 
The practical application is that the federal government could regulate (that potentially means Commercial Drivers Licenses, drug tests, physicals, and logbooks) every farmer who hauls grain to an elevator, even if they do not leave the county. I think even the most liberal founding fathers of this country would rise from the dead if this concept prevails. Nothing is more local than food production.
 
The government would like to impose commercial driver’s regulation on farm vehicles. I understand newer equipment travels farther than Grandpa’s M was ever envisioned to travel over the road. I also acknowledge that the equipment is significantly larger. Yet, I do not see how requiring a CDL to operate farm equipment will improve anything. 
 
My least favorite concept is requiring crop share farmers hauling the landowner’s portion to the elevator to be subject to federal motor carrier operation standards. That would seem to apply even if the crop share tenant is using a tractor and wagon. Consider the folks cruising across the state in RAGBRI this summer. As the Sag Wagons (which are converted school buses) and RV’s roll along the back roads of Iowa, rest assured no regulation is coming their way regarding hours of operation, driver qualification, etc., as the vehicles are, “for recreation,” and therefore not subject to the same standards as the combine would be. This type of action is exactly what Iowa Ag lawyers are all about, identifying the impact of the law as it relates to production agriculture.
 
Corn Smacks
 
When I was a kid, one of the forbidden breakfast cereals was “Sugar Smacks.” It was too much of a good thing that early in the morning (I think it was all sugar with a sugar chaser). Fear not, the Senate will not serve Corn Smacks to the ethanol industry. Ethanol provides too much locally controlled, renewable fuel supply for the country. America’s Nanny, the Senate, is leading the charge on eliminating subsidies for the growing ethanol industry. They wouldn’t want us to get too used to the idea of having our own, homegrown fuel supply. Ethanol only utilizes less than 2% of the world grain supply on 3% of the available acres. Funny, it was an oil state Senator who sponsored the idea and the gargantuan oil subsidies our government authorizes were not up for review. It appears the house will not follow suit. The house has, however, began to chip away at the Ag budget for the upcoming fiscal year.
 
 
Tax Breaks
 
Under Section 179 of the Internal Revenue code, the amount of depreciation expense a business can turn from a long term, slowly expense into an upfront, first year expense remains at high levels. For tax year 2011, this amount is $500,000. In addition, bonus depreciation (letting you take up to another 50% in upfront expenses) is available for 2011 tax year. While it seems like a long way away, operations are now 50% done. For the calendar basis taxpayer, getting an estimate on where your operation stands prior to the crunch at the end of the year is never a bad idea. The IRS is full of good ideas on how to prevent you from taking deductions



Iowa Ag Lawyer|In Bed with the Dragon

 May 2011 NE Iowa Farmer

Walking the Tight Rope. 
An individual can give up to $5 million during his or her lifetime without paying a gift tax, and for couples that threshold is $10 million. Before, the limit was $3.5 million per person. As land prices continue to rise, a smart estate plan could utilize the gift tax exclusion to pass on highly valued farm ground to the next generation. Ir a gift recipient decides to sell, that the land’s presumably low basis also transfers with the title, creating a capital gains tax issue  It is a delicate balance of interests to decide what is the best course of action and no one course of action fits all parties.  The higher gift tax exemption is only on the books until 2013, so those who take a long time to contemplate may be left out in the dust. The capital gains event can be wiped out by holding on to the property until death. The land is then subjects to creditors claims and if the value rises, puts the estate in the position of having to pay estate tax, which is higher than capital gains taxes usually.
 
In bed with the Dragon: Brazil’s Battle with China
 
China has become Brazil’s leading trading partner, buying increasing volumes of soybeans and iron ore, while investing billions in Brazil’s energy sector. The demand has helped fuel an economic boom.
Nearly 84 percent of Brazil’s exports to China in 2010 were raw materials, up from 68 percent in 2000. Yet roughly 98 percent of China’s exports to Brazil are manufactured products ( including the latest, inexpensive cars for Brazil’s emerging middle class )  that are beating down Brazil’s domestic industrial sector.
This is an unbalanced relationship.  China, however, is not content simply purchasing raw materials, they want to own  ground in Brazil. Brazil’s current government is not as China focused as the last one and is trying to rebalance the relationship and move closer to the U.S.
Brazil has taken steps to curb the ability of foreigners to own land outright, but China’s dominate position in the country’s economic structure will make sure it will be tough to tell China. By contrast, China does not allow ownership of much if any of its own soil by foreign concerns.
 
Brazil is the competitor of US Ag production since we both sell to China. China’s move to control the raw material production in Brazil should serve as a wake up call to US farmers and policy makers. As the government sits on its hands regarding free trade agreements with South Korea, Columbia and Panama, China plows ahead.  Once China secures the source of the raw materials it needs to feed its growing populace they will no longer need US products.
 
 
 
In Iowa, foreign concerns can’t own farm ground, in fact Iowa has a stringent set of rules on who can own farm ground. Corporations cannot own farm ground unless it is converted to non farm ground within 3 years of purchase or it is a family farm corporation.  An Iowa  Ag layer can help you determine if your company fits this exception.
 
 
 
 

Cuts like a Knife.
The Congress   recently moved to reduce the USDA spending levels down to 2008 budget levels. In fiscal year 2012, $108.2 billion is budgeted for “mandatory” programs such as food stamps ($71.2 billion), the Commodity Credit Corporation ($14.1 billion), the Federal Crop Insurance Corporation ($3.1 billion) and the Agricultural Marketing Service ($1.1 billion). Plus $17.25 billion in discretionary spending.
That is a lot of dough, even after it was subjected to the Congressional knife. Somehow, I think there is still fat on the meat that other interests like the EPA, Social Security, military spending are going to want to carve off to their own pet projects.
Buy Big or Go Home
Internal Revenue Service Revenue. Proc. 2011-21 and 2011-26 is not something to be read without access to Five Hour Energy or No Doze pills, however its has some very important implications to agricultural law. CPA Douglas Stives of Monmouth University provides some insightful points in analysis on those IRS documents.
The bottom line: There is a big incentive for businesses to buy a behemoth gas guzzler like a Cadillac Escalade or Ford Expedition this year. They can deduct 100% of the purchase price immediately (minus a disallowance for any personal use, of course). Lawmakers were far less generous with depreciation deductions for purchases of cars weighing less than 6,000 lbs.   How can this be?
*The IRS defines a “luxury car” as ,believe it or not, e costing more than $15,300. Such cars are subject to depreciation limits unless they weigh more than 6,000 lbs. and the special 100% deduction applies.
*The maximum first-year depreciation for these “luxury cars” is $11,060. This consists of an annual regular depreciation of $3,060 for the first year plus “bonus” depreciation of up to $8,000. The write-off in year two is normally $4,900, then $2,950 in year three, and $1,775 in tears four and beyond.
*Changes to the law last year left first-yext goround, so if the big vehicle is something your business operation needs, this may be the time to take the plunge.ar depreciation for “luxury cars” unchanged, but the congress reduced the out-year deductions for those costing less than $30,625. For example, a $20,000 car would get a second-year deduction of only $3,200 instead of $4,900.  The higher deductions still apply to cars costing more than $30,625  (and weighing less than 6,000 lbs.).
I would think something will be done about this the new tax rules. The IRS is always looking for revenue, it is in their nature and their name.



Iowa Ag Lawyer|What Shape is Your Hat

 

 

What shape is your hat
 
 
 
 
NE Iowa Farmer June 2011
 
 
The old joke that farmer’s seed corn caps are curved because of looking into the mailbox for the government check may become a thing of the past, and not because of electronic deposit.
With high prices for key agricultural commodities and rapid global increases in food demand, farm programs developed years ago in an era of low prices appear to be heading for the hangmen’s’ noose.   Dan Glickman, former USDA Secretary of Agriculture confirmed that sentiment at the recent   Economics Food and Agriculture Policy Conference.
Agriculture built a commodity surplus that lasted until a few years ago, but that’s no longer the case. Also with a national debt of $1.6 trillion,   lawmakers have to examine all programs, including agricultural ones. The latest tax proposal calls for an increase of taxes on those who make over $200,000 with a net result of $80 Billion in revenue. That is a drop in the bucket. It is like a company that is loosing $16,000 a year going to the bank and saying the only change we are making is we are taking $80 from our top sales guys. Would you lend money to that company? Yet, that is the proposal for our government to right itself. Program cuts are coming.
With key commodity prices strong, the next farm bill will be written under different circumstances all together. People live in largely urban areas, and “fly over” states where the majority of ag production (outside of California) exists are losing, not gaining, seats in the House and its Senators don’t seem to be all on the same page. Take for example, Senator Tom Harkin’s recent participation as a co chair of a conference whose focus is on   reducing meat consumption that is backed by the Human Society of the United States and foodie Michael Pollan. Hardly seems like that is representing Iowa in the least bit.
Crop insurance will play a larger role, and while the upper Midwest largely uses crop insurance, the deep south distains it. Either it doesn’t pay for the premium invested or they know that the federal government will gin up an ad hoc disaster bill for them in the event of true emergency. The response to the request for federal disaster area in Texas (denied) should serve as a warning.
 All is not lost for commodity supports, Senator Saxby Chambliss of Georgia has indicated that he saw the destruction of the southern textile industry because of government policy changes, and he will not witness the destruction of southern agriculture. Southern states rely heavily on commodity programs.
 
Different forces such as  health, national security and energy  have entered the farm policy debate. It wasn’t always like that. It used to be the farm states handled it. Now it is everybody’s business what is going on in the farm bill, not just Iowa Farm lawyers.
 
Even Prince Charles, fresh off of not paying for his son’s wedding, is getting in on the debate. He is an ardent organic advocate. He believes that growing populations, rising commodity prices, increased demand for meat as incomes grow, a changing climate, and limited water supplies are best dealt with by organic farming   because of its ability to maintain soil fertility reliance on chemical inputs. In a recent conference he called for pulling subsidies from conventional farmers and increasing their energy costs to provide more economic incentives for organic agriculture.
The United Nations says a billion people go hungry on this planet each day. And the overall population is growing. Experts expect we'll top 9 billion by 2045. Noted food prize winner Norman Borlaug has embraced technology as a means to meet the growing demand, I don’t see what the Prince has against technology. As a zealous Irishman, I am already prone to not listen to the Prince, but this really doesn’t make sense to me.   I could take some jabs at the Crown’s citizen’s health care, dental care and perhaps personal hygiene standards as further evidence of reluctance to adopt technology not resulting in positive results, but I digress. Organic farming has its place in the market as a “food choice” as does conventional farm operations who will continue to feed the masses. Any wonder that Whole Foods (a national organic retailer) is just now getting around to opening a store in Iowa? I don’t think it is about feeding the masses.
The bottom line is that agricultural operators should anticipate that the way the FFA instructor and their grandfather did things will not likely cut the mustard in the future. And maybe they should consider what type of hat they wear.
Get off your Farm
 The execution for over 100,000 acres of farm land and 90 homes and farm building sites in southeastern Missouri was in the middle of the night and without a final meal or request. With water flowing at 550 feet per second, the destruction was swift. At the time the levee was breached, acreage in the affected area was selling for between $4,000 and $6,000 an acre. Corn prices were about $6.75 a bushel and the land was producing about 200 bushels an acre. Wheat was selling for between $8 and $9 a bushel and the land was producing about 75 bushels an acre. Soybeans were selling for between $12 and $14 a bushel and the land was producing about 70 to 75 bushels an acre. The Corps of Engineers' own estimates place damage to the property   at more than $300 million.
Shortly thereafter attorneys filed a class action suit alleging the government violated the  farmers' property rights protected by the 5th Amendment of the Constitution. The Corps lacked the easement over the affected property in the floodway.  The class action complaint charges that the action violated the "takings clause" of the 5th Amendment which prevents the government from taking private property without due process of law the government must pay for the taking. 
In Iowa, such an easement would have been reflected in the abstract and brought to the purchaser’s attention via title opinion. Iowa is the only state that still uses abstracts and title opinions to make sure a purchaser of property knows exactly what encumbers the property. Other states just sell “title insurance” which , to me, is a form of legalized gambling that you actually own the property and that no easements will impact your use of the same.
The counter argument is that those farmers knew the corps could blow the levee at anytime and benefitted all these years from its protection. Therefore, they should just lump it and move along. I don’t think that will hold water with the courts. The actions of the government in this situation are little different than when the State of Iowa wanted to build Volga Lake into a destination recreation lake. The government took property of a private citizen and in both cases, the citizen needs to be compensated.

 




Iowa Ag Lawyer|Trying to Boss me around


NE Iowa Farmer April 2011
As 24 row planters with row unit shut offs and GPS guided crop inputs become routine and not a white elephant, the concept of hiring cheap labor to cover lots of acres becomes more mainstream.
 Employees, especially ag employees, have a their own set of rules to abide by. Previously we have discussed the differences between independent contractor and employee and what your Ag Lawyer can do to help you with that, so I will skip that discussion and focus on the relationship between employees and employers.
 
Being a better boss primarily requires us to communicate with our employees effectively. Recognizing that the leader and the led are only two portions of the puzzle, the message and the goal must also be considered when developing an effective communication relationship with employees. If you don’t communicate the goal, the led will substitute their own goal and when the goals don’t match, conflict results.
For example, during the spring, just prior to planting, your employee reports to work a 6 AM as normal, expecting to be gone by 2 PM, as per normal arrangement. The employee tells her husband to plan her to be home to prepare their own equipment for spring planting. However, you have decided to move equipment to your equipment to the field in hopes of calibrating all the electronics so that you can start when the crop insurance planting window opens up. Your goal is to make sure that on the first available day you are running hard, and you view this prep day as critical to get it all done, regardless of time spent. As mid afternoon approaches, two very different sets of expectations are brewing, which could have been avoided by cluing the employee in at the start of the day or beginning of the week on the things you, the employer, wanted accomplished.
On your organizational structure, it is extremely important understand how far your “aura” of control goes. In most organizations, about 5-6 people is as many as  should report to one person. It is interesting that the lowest level of leadership in the military is a team, which is 4-5 solider element lead by a team leader. Battle and time tested is good litmus test for any recommendation. If everyone of your employees report directly to you and you have more than 5 employees, you probably need to reassess.
In disciplining problem employees, it needs to consistent and follows the same procedures or it will not be perceived correctly.   Many of these reasons for underperformance relate to you as the employer versus the employee. Make sure that you can correct these issues first and then see if the employee remains an under performer. These issues can be lack of realistic expectations, lack of clear guidance, improper or incomplete training, or lack of delegation authority to the actual decision maker.
In dealing with under performers, make sure to DO SOMETHING about it. Refuse to allow the problem to fester. Stop the negative effects on the business, the worker’s happiness and the worker’s effectiveness.
 
As an employer, you want to be friendly and fair with all employees, but be a buddy of no employee.
Some key concepts to consider are
                           Get rid of the thought "I can do it better and quicker".
                           Delegate the results, not the method unless the method is crucial to the success.
                           Delegate every decision down to the lowest-ranked employee capable of making the decision. Remember, you can delegate authority, but not responsibility. Once you have delegate a task, DO NOT EVER take it back unless there is truly an impending disaster.
                            All employee’s capable of delegating a task should remember that concept as well.
                           Acknowledge the work, no matter how trivial it might seem. We all want to feel like we are contributing to the team. However, avoid pandering and baseless praise. A simple acknowledgement goes a lot farther that empty rhetoric.
 
 
Ever Wonder about flashing lights and what is required for
self propelled farm equipment but never wanted to ask an Iowa Ag Attorney.
Sunset to Sunrise-1 white light to the front, one red tail lamp to the rear and one amber flasher to the rear
Towed Implements
            One red tail lamp lighted at the rear of the towed implement
            Amber flasher on the towed implement if the flasher from the towing equipment is not visible
 
            All lights need to be visible for 500 feet.
 
Towing:
                             Registered vehicles (i.e. pickups)  -Safety chain and drawbar required
         Farm equipment towing farm equipment- drawbar, no safety chain required, though recommended.